Legal Opinion

Cann-Hanson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 25, 1996No. A96A2044PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

Robert Cann-Hanson was tried before a jury and found guilty of speeding and driving a moving vehicle with an alcohol concentration in his blood in excess of .10 grams in violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (4). On appeal from the judgment entered on the guilty verdicts, he enumerates as error that: (1) the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress the results of the breath test showing an alcohol concentration in his blood of .16 grams, and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdicts. We find no error and affirm both convictions.

1. Cann-Hanson moved to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. State v. PastoriniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Whitener v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Lyons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Frederick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Temples v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. State v. SledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API