Jarriel v. State

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Bryan Jarriel guilty of driving under the influence. In three enumerations of error, Jarriel challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. He also contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, Jarriel no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the jury’s verdict. We neither weigh the evidence nor assess witness credibility, but merely determine whether the evidence is sufficient to meet the standard set…