Legal Opinion

In re Condemnations for Improvement of Rouge River

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 21, 1920No. Nos. 6157, 6212, 6213PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In Equity. In the matter of petitions by the United States for condemnation of private property for the Improvement of Rouge River, a public use. On motions to dismiss.

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTUE, District Judge.

These are condemnation proceedings brought by the Secretary of War in the name of the United States, to take by right of eminent domain, certain lands owned by the respondents, for the purpose of improving the Rouge river, a navigable waterway located within this District and in the state of Michigan. The proceedings are based upon and involve the construction and validity of the Act of Congress of May 16, 1906, c. 2465, 34 Statutes at Large, 196 as amended by Act of June 29, Í905, c. 3628, 34 Statutes at 1 ,arge, 632, being section 9881 of West’s United States Compiled…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. Gulf Power Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1922
  5. United States v. Eighty Acres of Land in Williamson CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API