Samsun Corp. v. Khozestan Mashine Kar Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
This is a petition pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq, to compel arbitration of commercial disputes in New York. The respondent opposes the petition on the ground that the parties did not agree to New York arbitration. Subject matter jurisdiction in this Court arises out of the underlying maritime contract of charter party.
Background
Petitioner Samsun Corporation (“Sam-sun”), a Korean corporation, is the owner of the motor vessel PRABHU DAYA. Samsun alleges that on March 9, 1995, it entered into a voyage…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Mcallister Brothers, Inc. v. A & S Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Alabama v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Maritime Ventures International, Inc. v. Caribbean Trading & Fidelity, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Stolt-Nielsen SA v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Stolt-Nielsen SA v. Animalfeeds International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- U.S. Titan, Inc. v. Guangzhou Zhen Hua Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.