Legal Opinion

Hazard v. Potts

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff upon a trial had before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The action is to recover the sum of $112 for services rendered by the plaintiff’s assignor, Emory M. Wads-worth, 1VI. D., and Stuart H, Benton, as physicians. The pleadings were oral. The defendant is a married woman having a husband and two children, and although her husband was joined with her as a party defendant, she alone defended the action. The answer was a general denial, coverture and that the plaintiff was not the real party in interest.

At,the beginning of the trial, the defendants’ counsel admitted “ that the plaintiff’s assignors rendered for the defendant Robert Potts and his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crane v. . BaudouineNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Lindholm v. KaneNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bradt v. ShullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Webber v. SpannhakeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1876
  5. Estate of ShipmanNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Apostle v. PappasNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Weil v. SchneiderNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of WolpertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  4. Richards v. YoungAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
  5. Moore v. MurphyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API