Richards v. Young
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District. Action by George A. Richards against Louis McAllister Young. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. The action is to recover for medical services rendered by plaintiff to *266the defendant. The defendant went to plaintiff’s office, and requested treatment for herself and • child. This was given b)r the -plaintiff. Mother and child were respectively the wife and daughter of one Alexander C. Young, which fact plaintiff knew. Nothing was said regarding the payment for this treatment, .and it is conceded that defendant “knew that physicians, do not give their services free of charge.” It is conceded that there was no express contract made by the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crane v. . BaudouineNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hazard v. PottsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
- Mayer v. LithauerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Apostle v. PappasNew York Supreme Court · 1935