Legal Opinion

Lindholm v. Kane

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Chautauqua county court. Action by Perry D. Lindholm and John P. Anderson against Jennie H. Kane. From a judgment of the county court reversing a judgment of the justice court in favor of defendant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The action was to recover the amount of a bill for groceries alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendant; also to recover a further sum for constructing a sidewalk on the defendant’s premires. The latter claim was not questioned. Mbr was there any controversy had about the amount of the bill for groceries. The alleged liability of the defendant for them was denied and contested by her. The only question for consideration is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to permit the conclusion that the defendant was personally liable for the grocery bill. She was a married woman,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tiemeyer v. . TurnquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Kegney v. OvensNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Ehrich v. BuckiNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  4. Strong v. MoulNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Winkler v. SchlagerNew York Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grandy v. HadcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Valois v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Hazard v. PottsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
  4. Bradt v. ShullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Mettler v. SnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API