Legal Opinion

Prepakt Concrete Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 1, 1968No. Nos. 16187, 16188PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KILEY, Circuit Judge.

This suit by Prepakt Concrete Com-peny arises from the construction of a high-rise apartment building on property owned by Continental Illinois National Bank as trustee. Goethe Building Corporation was the prime contractor, and Mid-Continent Construction Company, Inc., its subcontractor. Prepakt was Mid-Continent’s second tier subcontract- or. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland furnished a labor and material payment bond for Mid-Continent.

Prepakt was not paid for the construction work which it performed on the apartment building. As a result, it sued Mid-Continent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoier v. KaplanIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. City of Chicago v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Standard Oil Co. of Indiana v. Daniel Burkhartsmeier Cooperage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  4. South Beloit Electric Co. v. Lar Gar Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. White v. GillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prepakt Concrete Company v. Fidelity And Deposit Company Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API