White v. Gillman
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of the city of Aurora; the Hon. E. G. Montony, Judge, presiding. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breese
It was substantially proved, that the plaintiff, Gillman, sold out to White all his interest in the crop he had raised on White’s land, for which White was to pay him five hundred dollars, and Gillman was to leave the premises with all his “ traps ” in ten days. Gillman did leave the premises with the bulk of his property and effects within the ten days, but left some geese and some shoats remaining there, and some sheep roaming about the place, and some ducks and turkeys. The appellant claimed that this removal with all his “traps ” in ten days, was a condition precedent, and not being…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nelson v. OrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rubens v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Palmer v. Meriden Britannia Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Prairie Farmer Co. v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Fagan v. RootbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Palmer v. Meriden Britannia Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.