Legal Opinion

Hoier v. Kaplan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1924No. 16001PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

The appellees, Harry Kaplan, Abe Sachs and Salomon Bin, as owners, on August 10, 1921, entered into a contract with William V. Hoier, doing business as the William V. Hoier Company, the appellant, by which the latter agreed to install, according to drawings and specifications, a heating and ventilating system in the building then to be erected at 2039 and 2041 West North avenue, Chicago. Construction of the building began in the autumn of 1921, and the owners desired that operations continue uninterruptedly during the ensuing winter months. To proceed with the interior work it became…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. George H. Sampson Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Barker & Stewart Lumber Co. v. Marathon Paper Mills Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Sebree v. SebreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Rittenhouse & Embree Co. v. F. E. Brown & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Midcoast Aviation, Inc. v. General Electric Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Kling v. GhilarducciIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Altschuler v. AltschulerIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Roddy v. Armitage-Hamlin Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Aluma Systems, Inc. v. Frederick Quinn Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API