Legal Opinion

New v. Page

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 28, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

Three cases have been consolidated for the purposes of this appeal. In the suits as separately tried judgments, were recovered by the Receiver of the Lafayette Bank, of Baltimore, upon individual promissory notes for $1,500 each, payable to its order, made by the respective appellants. Upon one of the notes a bank deposit of the maker to the amount of $392.90 had been credited. The appellants Were three of the twelve directors of the bank. The notes, were given in pursuance of a plan for the directors' to. finance the subscription and payment for the previously unissued portion of the capital…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rankin v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Lyons v. BenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Skagit State Bank v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Union Bank v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Lattanner v. HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Messick v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. The Coast National Bank v. BloomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. Katski v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Schmid v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API