Legal Opinion
Danielle M. Tsimbidy-Rochu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1969No. 23660_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
These consolidated appeals from an order of deportation and an order refusing to reconsider it raise three questions. The first, whether an order of deportation is a denial of due process, is answered adversely to petitioner in Hari-siades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580, 72 S.Ct. 512, 96 L.Ed. 586 (1952).
The second, whether an order of deportation constitutes cruel and unusual punishment within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment, is answered adversely to petitioner by Burr v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 350 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1965), and Soewapadji v. Wixon, 157 F.2d 289 (9th Cir.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Donald Thomas Burr v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- James Edward Kelly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Leonard Alfred Brownrigg v. The United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Soewapadji v. WixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Gerald Ray BergemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Manzoor H. Qureshi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service of the Department of Justice of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Stokes v. United States, Immigration & Nat. Serv.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Ioannis Georgios Kolios v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Robert James AndrinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.