Legal Opinion
Stokes v. United States, Immigration & Nat. Serv.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1975No. 74 Civ. 1022 CLBPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRIE ANT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek a preliminary and permanent injunction and a declaratory judgment declaring 8 U.S.C. §§ 1154, 1225 and 1357, as well as the regulations found in 8 C.F.R. §§ 103.2 and 204.1(a), and Immigration and Naturalization Form 1-130 (“1-130”) promulgated thereunder, unconstitutional on various grounds as allegedly violative of Bill of Rights liberties.
Plaintiffs Bernard Stokes and Charles Cook are citizens of the United States. Both Stokes and Cook met women who were citizens of Guyana, visiting the United States on non-immigrant visas. The…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Elias Eid v. John ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Der-Rong Chour v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Fuzie v. Manor Care, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
- Campbell v. A. C. Petersen Farms Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
- Jafarzadeh v. DukeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.