Legal Opinion

Hoagland v. Chargin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1955No. Civ. 16378PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

Defendants appeal from judgments in favor of plaintiffs rendered after jury verdicts in favor of all three plaintiffs against both defendants. The action arose out of an automobile accident on Bayshore Highway when the automobile driven by defendant Joseph Chargin III, and belonging to Joseph Chargin, Jr., was struck by plaintiff’s automobile as the Chargin car was executing a left turn at the intersection of said highway with Story Road.

It was plaintiffs’ and respondents’ theory at the trial that appellant driver stopped between the islands on Bayshore Highway, and then cut across the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Zelayeta v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Estate of McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. MacLean v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Stevens v. Roman Catholic Bishop of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Roscoe Moss Co. v. RoggeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API