Legal Opinion

Lay v. Carter

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Hiram Lay and others against Eleazer Carter and the Town of Seneca Falls to restrain defendant Carter from interfering with the fence or any portion of a family cemetery. Judgment establishing boundaries.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

For nearly a century there has existed and been in common use for burial purposes a cemetery located on the south side of Washington street in the village of Bridgeport, formerly West Cay*1082uga, Seneca county, N. Y. This cemetery occupied lots No. 41 and 42 on a map called the “Annin Map,” which was made about 1801. Just south of and adjoining this cemetery is lot No. 40, and a portion of it has been used as a burying ground by members of the Lay family for a period exceeding 75 years. The cemetery first mentioned was commonly called the “Bridgeport Cemetery,” while the burying ground on lot 40,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chew v. First Presbyterian Church of Wilmington, Del., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1916
  2. Rodman v. MishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Clarke v. KeatingNew York Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API