Legal Opinion

Rodman v. Mish

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

Throughout the defendants’ pleadings they refer to themselves as the “descendants” of Gabe Robason and also speak of the latter as their ancestor. Nowhere do they state their relationship to Gabe Robason, nor to any other person buried in the “Robason Burial Ground”.

In King v. Smith, 236 N.C. 170, 72 S.E. 425, Barnhill, J., speaking for the Court, said: “If the graves of the ancestors of plaintiffs were desecrated as alleged, then the cause of action created thereby vested in the next of kin of the Kings who were then living, but, in ascertaining who are the next of kin, it must be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Kenner v. CousinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Lay v. CarterNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  4. King v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. FOREST CREEK LTD. PARTNERSHIPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. King v. Pender Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. King v. Pender Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API