Legal Opinion
Moore v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 4, 2007No. B195412PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
Following a hearing before a board of rights, appellant Tyrone Moore was removed from his position as a police officer for the City of Los Angeles (City). Moore filed a petition for administrative mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, which challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support his removal. The trial court rejected Moore’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, as well as an argument that the City violated Moore’s right to have the investigation into his conduct completed within the one-year statute of limitations found in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Resource Defense Fund v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- City of Walnut Creek v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Takahashi v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Alameida v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Lanigan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Daugherty v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Amaro v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.