Legal Opinion
Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 17, 1948No. Civ. No. 7576PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a Michigan corporation, is a distributor of gas in the metropolitan Detroit area, and the defendant, a Delaware corporation, is the operator of an interstate gas pipe line system. Jurisdiction of the court is based upon the statutory amount in controversy and the diversity of the citizenship of the parties..
The complaint sets out the grievances of the plaintiff which are based upon the defendant’s breach of its contract with the plaintiff by the terms of which the defendant agreed to deliver to the plaintiff its natural gas requirements up to 125,000,000…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- West v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949