Legal Opinion

Sheep Mountain Alliance v. Board of County Commissioners

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2011No. 11CA0588PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Plaintiff, Sheep Mountain Alliance (SMA), appeals the judgment denying its request for relief under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) from a resolu tion of the defendant, Montrose County Board of County Commissioners (Board), conditionally granting Energy Fuels Resources Corporation (Energy Fuels) a special use permit (SUP) to operate a uranium and vanadium mill and tailings disposal facility within the county. We affirm.

I. Background

In March 2008, Energy Fuels publicly introduced its plan to construct a uranium and vanadium ore processing mill and disposal facility in the Paradox…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Bar MK Ranches v. YuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Steven M. SelfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Van Sickle v. BoyesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rags Over the Arkansas River, Inc. v. Colorado Parks & Wildlife BoardColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Williams v. Department of Public SafetyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Joseph v. Mieka Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. City and County of Denver v. GutierrezColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Khelik v. City & Cnty. of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API