Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A.R.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 2007No. 05-06-00589-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

Opinion by Justice RICHTER.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied. We withdraw our earlier opinion of August 15, 2007 and vacate our judgment of that date. This is now the opinion of the court.

This appeal arises out of a post-divorce modification action in which a jury awarded custody of A.R., a minor, to appellee Jamie Rosenthal, the father. Appellant Janay Rosenthal, the mother, appeals the trial court’s final award of custody, possession, and access, and a separate order of contempt.2 In seven issues, mother asserts the trial court abused its discretion by: (1)…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bowie Memorial Hospital v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. in the Interest of S.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. In the Interest of A.B.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. In the Interest of A.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Alta Mesa Holdings, L.P., Alta Mesa Acquisition Sub, LLC, the Meridian Resource & Exploration LLC Change in Control Severance Plan, and the Meridian Resource & Exploration, LLC v. Steven Ives and Lloyd DelanoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. in the Interest of I. D. G. v. A. G., E. R. G. and R. J. G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API