Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Heller

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1919No. 1413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company against Clyde A. Heller and others.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff presents a strong appeal for relief from the hard situation in which it finds itself.

A short outline statement of the facts develops the point presented in this case to be ruled: Willis D. Hogue brought an action against the Washington Oregon Company in the state courts of Oregon. Judgment was recovered against the defendant in this action. The defendant desired to take an appeal to the Supreme Court of the state. To do this it was necessary for it to enter bond in the sum of $30,000 with surety. The defendant in that judgment applied to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dambmann v. . SchultingNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. United States v. BarlowSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Goodno v. HotchkissDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1916
  5. Riegel v. American Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1944
  2. United States v. PyleDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Cramer Mfg. Corp. v. Royal Exchange Assur., Ltd.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API