Legal Opinion
United States v. Pyle
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 9, 1965No. Civ. No. 5738PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOHANON, District Judge.
This is an action by the United States of America, as the real party in interest, based upon a claim of the Commodity Credit Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Commodity,” created by the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act (15 U.S.C. § 714 et seq.), an agency wholly owned by the United States of America, and this Court has jurisdiction by virtue of the provisions of Section 4(c) of the Act (15 U.S.C. § 714b(c)), against the defendants E. C. Pyle and Charles Y. Pyle, dba E. C. Pyle and Son Warehouses, a partnership, hereinafter designated “Pyle,” and United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Warner v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Alcoa S. S. Co., Inc. v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Duffy Theatres, Inc. v. Griffith Consol. Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Hooper v. Commercial Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance v. StanfordDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967