Legal Opinion

Weseman v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Company

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 11, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00160Unknown

1Opinion

WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA CARRIE WESEMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ALYESKA PIPELINE SERVICE COMPANY, ) ) No. 3:20-cv-0160-HRH Defendant. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Partial Motion to Dismiss Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiff’s Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) claims.1 This motion is opposed.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary. Background Plaintiff Carrie Weseman alleges that she was employed by defendant Alyeska Pipeline Service Company from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API