Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Goodall

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 2004No. 2004-0825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, L. Sharon Goodall of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0061132, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1993. On October 6, 2003, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with having violated the Code of Professional Responsibility. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline heard the cause and, based on comprehensive stipulations, exhibits, and testimony, made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation, all of which the board adopted.

*502Misconduct

{¶ 2} Prior to her admission to the Ohio bar, respondent had worked…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. HolcombeOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CushionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Muskingum County Bar Ass'n v. WorkmanOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In re GoodallOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. LinnenOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Mason (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API