Legal Opinion

Swenson v. Erickson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2007No. 20060190PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals

NEHRING, Justice:

1 1 On this, their second visit to this court, the plaintiffs provide us with the opportunity to hold that, in ruling on their first appeal in Swenson v. Erickson (Swenson I), 2000 UT 16, ¶ 34, 998 P.2d 807, we intended to permit the property owners in the Quail Point Subdivision to vote to change their restrictive covenants on January 1, 2004, during the daylight hours and not just within the sixty seconds between midnight and 12:01 a.m.

BACKGROUND

{2 With a brief chronicle of events, we endeavor to explain how a dispute between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colosimo v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Swenson v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walker v. Zeus Land HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API