Legal Opinion

Colosimo v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2007No. 20050074PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Ralph Louis Colosimo and Charles Matthew Colosimo filed suit against Judge Memorial High School and its former administrators (collectively, "Judge"); the Salt Lake Diocese, Judge's Board of Financial Trustees, the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales, the Archdiocese of San Francisco (collectively, the "institutional defendants"); and individual defendant James F. Rapp, a former teacher at Judge. The Colosimos seek damages arising from their alleged sexual abuse by Rapp more than three decades ago. The district court entered default judgment against Rapp, but…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Foil v. BallingerUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Parks v. KownackiIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Arnold v. GrigsbyUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Pierucci v. PierucciCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  5. Ellsworth Paulsen Construction Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API