Legal Opinion

Swenson v. Erickson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 2, 2006No. 20041041-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

¶ 1 David and Barbara Swenson appeal the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of their complaint against David V. Erickson and David R. Limberg (collectively, Defendants). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The Swensons, Erickson, and Limberg are owners of abutting lots in the Quail Point Subdivision (the Subdivision) in Sandy, Utah. A real estate development company created the Quail Point Subdivision in July 1973, at which time that company recorded the Quail Point Subdivision Restrictive Covenants (the Covenants).

¶3 In 1997, Erickson began building a structure he intended to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cummings v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fairbourn Commercial, Inc. v. American Housing Partners, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cooley v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Inman v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API