Swenson v. Erickson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McHUGH, Judge:
¶ 1 David and Barbara Swenson appeal the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of their complaint against David V. Erickson and David R. Limberg (collectively, Defendants). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The Swensons, Erickson, and Limberg are owners of abutting lots in the Quail Point Subdivision (the Subdivision) in Sandy, Utah. A real estate development company created the Quail Point Subdivision in July 1973, at which time that company recorded the Quail Point Subdivision Restrictive Covenants (the Covenants).
¶3 In 1997, Erickson began building a structure he intended to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Cummings v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Fairbourn Commercial, Inc. v. American Housing Partners, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Cooley v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Inman v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2007