Legal Opinion
Rodrigues v. Hrinda
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 24, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 14-72 EriePublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
KNOX, District Judge.
This is a medical mal-practice action in which the defendants are the doctors who operated on plaintiff for a tonsillectomy on February 18, 1970. Plaintiff claims that as a result of the operation he was left with left-sided paralysis which would appear to be the result of a stroke of some sort, that the condition did not exist before the operation and it was observed when he regained consciousness the next morning. Plaintiff seeks to ask the defendants in discovery depositions as to why this happened.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Wilmington Country Club v. Horwath & HorwathDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
3Cited by13 opinions
- Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Rivera Alejandro v. Algarín LópezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1982
- Adkins v. MortonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stabilus v. Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & GreavesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Stufflebam v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.