Legal Opinion

In re Cantrell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 2, 2003No. 2003-B-0910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

LPER CURIAM.

This matter arises from a petition for consent discipline filed by respondent, Harry E. Cantrell, Jr., an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana. For his misconduct, respondent proposed that he be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day, fully deferred, subject to an eighteen-month period of supervised probation with conditions. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) concurred in respondent’s petition, and the disciplinary board recommended the proposed discipline be accepted.

UNDERLYING FACTS

The Defillo Matter

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Mayor of South Memphis v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1855
  4. In re DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. In re ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re LeBlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. In re DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API