Hotelling v. Walther
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
This is an action for malpractice. The plaintiff has appealed from an adverse judgment based on the verdict of a jury, which found in effect that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. There had been a previous trial, which resulted in a judgment of involuntary nonsuit on the ground that the statute of limitations had run. The court below set aside that judgment and granted a new trial, and on appeal to this court its action was sustained. We held that the tort alleged was a continuing one and that “the statute runs from the last date of the continuous negligent treatment”: 169…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Williams v. RaganOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Fitze v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State of Oregon v. NodineOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Dowell v. MossbergOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.