Legal Opinion

Aearo Technologies LLC v. Parties Listed on Appendix A to the Complaint et a

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided August 26, 2022No. 22-50059Unknown

1Opinion

a> ee ww OZ TA be A Ee Be rAMyg ws aw, fa WS ee wt See ee) Dh Me EES Jetirey Ji Gratem aT Si United spate {Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION IN RE: ) ) AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, e¢ al. ! ) Case No. 22-02890-JJG-11 ) (Jointly Administered) Debtors. ) ) 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, ) AEARO HOLDING LLC, ) AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, ) AEARO LLC, and ) AEARO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) Adv. Pro. No. 22-50059 ) THOSE PARTIES LISTED ON ) APPENDIX A TO THE COMPLAINT and_) JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-1000, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API