Legal Opinion

Booe v. Shadrick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1987No. 8618SC166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns error to the exclusion of the testimony of the witness Arthur Cogswell, the supervising architect on each of the construction projects involved here, concerning the reputation of the defendant Shadrick. On voir dire, Cogswell testified that defendant Shadrick had a reputation of being “rather hard on subcontractors” in that he schemed to take advantage of small unsophisticated contractors by signing them on to do a much larger project than they normally handle and then blaming them for cost overruns and delays. Plaintiff contends that this testimony should have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Environmental Landscape Design Specialist v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Durham v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. F.H. Hood T/A Hood Construction Co. v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shelton v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. Harry Dowless v. Warren-Rupp Houdailles, Inc., and Houdailles Industries, Inc., Harry Dowless v. Warren-Rupp Houdailles, Inc. Houdailles Industries, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API