Tomlinson v. Golden
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. James A. Howe, Judge. This is a controversy between adjoining lot owners over the location of tbeir dividing line. The plaintiff brought this action to enjoin interference with his fence. There was a decree for the plaintiff establishing the line as claimed by him. The defendants appeal. —
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
— Eeference to the following plat will aid to an understanding of the case.
This is a plat of an addition to Des Moines known as Kauffman Place. The plaintiff is the owner of the north half of lot 22, and the defendants are a the owners of the south half thereof. This lot faces east on *238Thirty-Sixth street. Thirty-Sixth street runs north and south. What appears as “A” street in the plat is referred to as Thirty-Seventh street in this record. From the southeast corner of lot 22 to the northeast corner of lot 14 is a distance of six hundred feet according to the plat, and according to the ground.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrow v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Flynn v. GlennyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Olson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- O'Farrel v. HarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Marsh v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arnold v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Langle v. BrauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Pine v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Brause v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914