Legal Opinion

Olson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1903No. 4419PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Geoege Meade Emoby, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

In March, 1888, Harry White and his wife, Anna, being then the owners in fee of certain real property situated in King county, platted the same into lots, blocks, streets and alleys, and caused a plat thereof to he made out and duly recorded in the auditor’s office of King county, under the name of the “Second Motor Line Addition to the City of Seattle.” Prior to the filing *688of the plat the land was regularly surveyed, and the several lots, blocks, streets and alleys into which it was divided were marked upon the ground by posts or stakes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Brown v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Racine v. J. I. Case Plow Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Fleischfresser v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Colby v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. E. F. Gregory Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Fagan v. WaltersWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lund v. Idaho & Washington Northern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Swope v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Kaler v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API