People v. Jarrell
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
Defendant David Lee Jarrell (appellant) was found guilty by jury of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 459, 460, subd. 1). On appeal he argues (1) that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that if appellant was guilty of burglary, it was burglary in the first degree as a matter of law; (2) that the trial court should have suppressed appellant’s involuntary confession and the identification testimony of a key witness; (3) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel; and (4) that the trial court erred in advising the jury to first determine his guilt or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. GodinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. NavaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.