People v. Flood
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
76 Cal.Rptr.2d 180 (1998)
957 P.2d 869
18 Cal.4th 470
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Hal Lee FLOOD, Defendant and Appellant.
No. S059454.
Supreme Court of California.
July 2, 1998.
Carlton E. Lacy, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Walnut Creek, for Defendant and Appellant.
Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Ronald A. Bass, Assistant Attorney General, Stan M. Helfman, Sharon G. Birenbaum and David D. Salmon, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
GEORGE, Chief Justice.
A jury found defendant Hal Lee Flood guilty of…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Werdegar; Concurrence · Chin; Dissent · Mosk; Dissent · Kennard.
2Cases cited114 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (HC) Foster v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Oquita v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- United States v. Melvin Martinez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017