Legal Opinion

Reese v. Hartnett

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 9, 1950No. 132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.-:

The question posed by the pending motion is whether the petition makes out a proper case for relief. For present purposes the allegations in the petition must be taken as true.

Counsel for the Levy Court suggests three reasons why relief should not be granted: (1) the impropriety, in a declaratory judgment case, of entering an executory order in favor of one defendant against another defendant; (2) the pendency of the writ of error: (3) the failure to allege that the County Comptroller has approved the bills.

The first objection is answered by the Declaratory Judgments Act itself.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GlennSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. State v. WiseSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
  3. Blaustein v. Standard Oil Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. HillSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API