Legal Opinion

Blaustein v. Standard Oil Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 1, 1945No. Foreign attachment-covenant, No. 136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

It is apparent that if the order of the Court quashing the writ of foreign attachment and dissolving the attachment made thereunder be entered without some stay of operation, that then the suing out of a writ of error thereafter and in said proceedings might be a vain and useless thing. *240If the attachment be dissolved and the writ quashed before the suing out of the writ of error, the conclusion of the Appellate Court on such writ of error might have nothing upon which it could operate and be effective. The authorities are in conflict, but it is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Home Fire Insurance v. DutcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. American Surety Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Caulk v. NicholsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  2. Reese v. HartnettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Caulk v. NicholsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API