Legal Opinion

Zmuda v. Chesterfield Valley Power Sports, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 2008No. ED 90788PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Ed Zmuda (“Zmuda”) appeals the judgment of the trial court granting the motion to dismiss of Chesterfield Valley Power Sports, Inc. (“Chesterfield Valley”) with prejudice. Zmuda argues the trial court erred in granting Chesterfield Valley’s motion because he stated a claim upon which relief can be granted for violation of section 484.020 RSMo (2000) 1 and the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, section 407.010, et seq. We reverse and remand.

Zmuda filed a class action petition stemming from his purchase of an all-terrain vehicle (“ATV”) from Chesterfield Valley. In connection with Zmuda’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eisel v. Midwest BankCentreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Clement v. St. Charles Nissan, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. S & P PROPERTIES, INC. v. City of University CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amburgy v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009
  2. Casey v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Chochorowski v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
  5. Janson v. Legalzoom.Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API