Legal Opinion
In Re Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 11, 2011No. M 07-1827 SI, C 10-3619 SI. MDL No. 1827PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
787 F.Supp.2d 1036 (2011)
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
This Order Relates To:
States of Missouri, Arkansas, Michigan, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, Plaintiffs,
v.
Au Optronics Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Nos. M 07-1827 SI, C 10-3619 SI. MDL No. 1827.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
April 11, 2011.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFEDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On February 18, 2011, the Court heard argument on defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China Minmetals Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Byler v. Deluxe Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- In re Lidoderm Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In re Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Connecticut v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2025