Legal Opinion
Lascaris v. New York State Department of Social Services
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn R. Tenney, J.
Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment in an action brought against the defendant seeking a determination that his recent amendment of 18 NYCEE 369.1 is illegal, and therefore void. It is stipulated by both parties that there are no issues of fact involved, and that the court has jurisdiction to determine this matter.
On August 5, 1970, defendant George K. Wyman, as Commissioner of the Department of Social Services, by promulgation, amended 18 NYCEE 369.1. As it is now written, a social service worker may not discontinue ADC (aid to dependent children) benefits to a mother or her children…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wyman v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doe v. ShapiroDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reed v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. FortierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984