Berends v. MacK Truck, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
¶ 1. Thomas Berends appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint for relief under Wisconsin's "Lemon Law," Wis. Stat. § 218.015. The circuit court granted summary judgment in Mack Truck's favor on grounds that Berends' required notice to Mack Truck was defective because: (1) it failed to specify whether Berends wanted a new motor vehicle or a refund of the purchase price; (2) it offered Mack Truck a third option not provided by statute— repairing the vehicle within seven days; and (3) it failed to offer to transfer title to Mack Truck. We conclude that each of the first two reasons…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Frederick v. McCaughtryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Church v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garcia v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Schonscheck v. Paccar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Marquez v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Indianhead Motors v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Garcia v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.