Legal Opinion

Berends v. MacK Truck, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 20, 2002No. 01-0911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

¶ 1. Thomas Berends appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint for relief under Wisconsin's "Lemon Law," Wis. Stat. § 218.015. The circuit court granted summary judgment in Mack Truck's favor on grounds that Berends' required notice to Mack Truck was defective because: (1) it failed to specify whether Berends wanted a new motor vehicle or a refund of the purchase price; (2) it offered Mack Truck a third option not provided by statute— repairing the vehicle within seven days; and (3) it failed to offer to transfer title to Mack Truck. We conclude that each of the first two reasons…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  2. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. Frederick v. McCaughtryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. Church v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Schonscheck v. Paccar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  3. Marquez v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  4. Indianhead Motors v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  5. Garcia v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API