Legal Opinion
Schonscheck v. Paccar, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided March 4, 2003No. 02-1413PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Kenworth Truck Company appeals a judgment finding it in violation of Wisconsin's lemon law, Wis. Stat. § 218.0171. Kenworth argues: (1) Gary Schonscheck's demand failed to satisfy the statutory requirements of the lemon law because it did not specifically indicate what form of relief was demanded; (2) Kenworth is not liable for components that it did not manufacture and that were excluded from its express warranty; and (3) the vehicle did not have a nonconformity that substantially impaired its use or value. We disagree with Kenworth's arguments and affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. WilliquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Hopper v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tammi v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- State v. BarbeauCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- Townsend v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- Smith v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- Harvot v. Solo Cup Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.