Legal Opinion

Hollinger International Inc. v. Hollinger Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 16, 2005No. 04 C 698PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NOLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants Hollinger Inc., The Ravelston Corporation Limited, Ravelston Management, Inc., Conrad Black, F. David Radler, John A. Boultbee, and Barbara Amiel-Blaek (collectively, the “Defendants”) move to compel the production of documents from Plaintiff Hollinger International, Inc. (“Hollinger”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(2)(B). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion to Compel [174-1] is denied.

DISCUSSION 1

As background, Hollinger states that it has produced more than 840,000 pages of documents,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Stern v. O'QuinnDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  4. Lindley v. Life Investors InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Reitz v. City of Mt. JulietDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API