Legal Opinion
Charne v. Essex Chair Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 28, 1950No. 75-50PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint in this action on the ground that the action is not between citizens of different states. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(a) (1). From the record it appears that plaintiff Charles Chame is a citizen and resident of Pennsylvania, that the defendant Essex Chair Company is a New Jersey corporation, and that Samuel Handel, trustee of Azalea Manufacturing Company, is a citizen and resident of New Jersey. Answers to interrogatories show that one of the partners of Salem Furniture Company is a citizen and resident of New Jersey.
In actions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kroese v. General Steel Castings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. BarkhausenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Osthaus v. ButtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grant County Deposit Bank v. McCampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Eastern Metals Corporation v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Harrell & Sumner Contracting Co. v. Peabody Petersen Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Harrell And Sumner Contracting Company, Inc. v. Peabody Petersen CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Smith v. SMITH, BARNEY, ETC.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.