Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Sewell

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1923No. 7 Div. 905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBRICIvEN, P. J.

To appellee’s complaint, containing two counts, the appellants filed a plea of the general issue, and appellant bank also interposed two special pleas. No demurrers were filed to the complaint or the pleas. The merits of the case depend upon the proof offered in support of the issues thus made by the pleadings.

The first count is in trover, but contains no allegation of ownership of the property 'alleged to have been converted. It therefore was subject to appropriate demurrer. Weil Bros. v. Ponder, 127 Ala. 296, 28 South. 656. Without intimating any opinion as to. whether, in view of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  2. Windham & Co. v. Stephenson & AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Weil Bros. v. PonderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Griffis v. WilsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Henderson v. PilleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Albertville Trading Co. v. CritcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Douglass v. N. S. Davenport Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Sewell v. RichardsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API