Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Richardson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1925No. 7 Div. 109Published

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The right of recovery by plaintiff rested solely upon the validity of a certain mortgage executed by Gordon Nixon and C. G. Nixon, under date of January 1, 1920, and payable to plaintiff, on the 15th day of October, 1920. Richardson v. Sewell, 19 Ala. App. 399, 97 So. 678. To create a title or lien by mortgage on crops to be grown, as against defendants who are third persons, such crops included in such mortgage must be the contemplated product of land in which the mortgagor had, at the time, a present or potential interest.. Vinson Bros. v. Finlay, 206 Ala. 478, 90 So. 310; Smith v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Davenport & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Alexander v. GarlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Vinson Bros. v. FinlaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Richardson v. SewellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API