Legal Opinion
Licursi v. Sweeney
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 3, 1991No. 89-277PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendant, David J. Sweeney, purchased a restaurant in Stowe from plaintiff, Jane Licursi, giving three mortgages, including a third mortgage to plaintiff, to finance the purchase. Plaintiff regained title by foreclosing on her third mortgage and by buying out the second mortgage. She then brought this action on the unpaid note, which the second mortgage secured, and obtained a judgment below. Defendant appeals, arguing in various ways that no action lies on this note. We agree and reverse.
In 1983 plaintiff sold the Matterhorn Restaurant in Stowe to defendant and R. Bruce Nourjian for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Wright v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Walker, Smith & Co. v. BaxterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- Hewey v. RichardsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Board of Trustees of the General Retirement System v. Ren-Cen Indoor Tennis & Racquet ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nancy and Stjepan Sostaric v. Sally MarshallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- New England Educational Training Service, Inc. v. Silver Street PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Atlantic National Trust, Ltd. Liability Co. v. GundersonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2000
- Lost Mountain Development Co. v. Rufus King v. Matthew B. KezarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006