Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1983No. 14372PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

For most of the twentieth century, our correctional system in Idaho has been anchored upon the concept of indeterminate sentencing. However, in 1977 our Legislature embarked upon a new course, authorizing district judges to choose fixed term sentences as alternatives to indeterminate sentences. I.C. § 19-2513A. Today we encounter a case that requires us to determine whether a fixed sentence is excessive.

Danny Dean Miller shot and killed a young woman with whom he was intimately acquainted. They had driven a car to a place near the Snake River in Minidoka County. Miller later…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. CottonIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. FuchsIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. RawsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. GarzaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. RosencrantzIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. AmersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. BeltranIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. MartinezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API