Legal Opinion

Enstrom v. Neumoegen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 5, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District. Action by Charles J. N. Enstrom against Manfred E. Neumoegen. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

While attempting to cross from the south to the north side of West Seventy-Second street, near Broadway, in the borough of Manhattan, on January 14, 1910, at noon, the plaintiff was struck by the outside wheel of the defendant’s automobile. The car was standing in West Seventy-Second street, at the north curb, when the plaintiff started to cross in the rear of it, with two other men just ahead of him. The others reached the curbstone in safety; but as the plaintiff was passing back of the car, and six feet distant, without any warning whatever, it was suddenly backed with such speed that he…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Volosko v. Interurban Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. O'Reilly v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. O'Reilly v. Brooklyn Heights R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Lundy v. Second Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McManus v. Arnold Taxi Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Oliver v. WeaverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Bennett v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Trout v. BrightUnited States District Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API